← All parts of this equation

Equation 3 · Part 2 · AI Alignment and Safety in 2035: Two Axes, Four Scenarios, and What Would Falsify Them

Symbol t

G(t)=C(t)−V(t),dGdt=dCdt−dVdt.G(t) = C(t) - V(t), \qquad \frac{\mathrm{d}G}{\mathrm{d}t} = \frac{\mathrm{d}C}{\mathrm{d}t} - \frac{\mathrm{d}V}{\mathrm{d}t}.
tt

What this part means

t is an argument of the function-like quantity on the left; its role is set by that function’s stated inputs.

Its job in the formula

t is an argument of the function-like quantity on the left; its role is set by that function’s stated inputs.

The passage around this formula

Whether the documented gap between capability and verified safety narrows or widens is not a third axis; it is what the other two jointly produce. Write C(t) for a stylised index of frontier capability — METR’s time-horizon trend is the best-measured available proxy [ 16 ] — and V(t) for an index of independently checkable verification coverage: the share of a system’s decision-relevant behaviour that something other than watching its output can vouch for. The gap is G(t)=C(t)−V(t),dGdt=dCdt−dVdtG(t) = C(t) - V(t), \qquad \frac{\mathrm{d}G}{\mathrm{d}t} = \frac{\mathrm{d}C}{\mathrm{d}t} - \frac{\mathrm{d}V}{\mathrm{d}t}. The gap narrows exactly when verification coverage grows faster than capability does. Axis A determines whether d\mathrm{d}V/d\mathrm{d}t can be large at all — whether there is a technique to scale in the…

Read this part in the article →

Learn the underlying idea

A variable is a named place for a value. Its letter is a local label: x can mean position in one formula and a data point in another.

Open the illustrated variables: a letter stands for a value guide →

See this notation across published equations →

Sources cited in the surrounding passage

These citations provide research context; check each source for the exact claim it supports.