← Back to article

Equation 20 · A Chatbot Confessed to Being Built by a Company That Never Trained It

What does this equation mean?

I0I_0

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

the article’s single most important number, because it is the rate at which the trait shows up in models that never touched the source at all — the convergence baseline , the rate any theory of pure coincidence has to beat. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

I0I_0

Symbol I_0

the article’s single most important number, because it is the rate at which the trait shows up in models that never touched the source at all — the convergence baseline , the rate any theory of pure coincidence has to beat.

Understand this part →

subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read this expression with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

Sort a population of models M\mathcal{M}=\{m1m_1,…\dots,mNm_N\} into the three exposure classes just defined, MV\mathcal{M}_V , MH\mathcal{M}_H , and M∅\mathcal{M}_\varnothing . For each model m , define its trait incidence as I(m)=1k\frac{1}{k}∑q∈Q\sum_{q\in Q}1\mathbb{1}[rm(q)r_m(q)∈\inT\mathcal{T}] , where Q is the held-out probe set of size k and rm(q)r_m(q) is m ’s response to probe q . I(m) is a dimensionless rate between 0 and 1: the fraction of probes that elicit the trait. Average I(m) within each class to get IˉV\bar I_V , IˉH\bar I_H , and I0I_0=Iˉ∅\bar I_\varnothing . I0I_0 is the article’s single most important number, because it is the rate at which the trait shows up in models that never touched the source at all — the…
Read the full surrounding passage
Sort a population of models M\mathcal{M}=\{m1m_1,…\dots,mNm_N\} into the three exposure classes just defined, MV\mathcal{M}_V , MH\mathcal{M}_H , and M∅\mathcal{M}_\varnothing . For each model m , define its trait incidence as I(m)=1k\frac{1}{k}∑q∈Q\sum_{q\in Q}1\mathbb{1}[rm(q)r_m(q)∈\inT\mathcal{T}] , where Q is the held-out probe set of size k and rm(q)r_m(q) is m ’s response to probe q . I(m) is a dimensionless rate between 0 and 1: the fraction of probes that elicit the trait. Average I(m) within each class to get IˉV\bar I_V , IˉH\bar I_H , and I0I_0=Iˉ∅\bar I_\varnothing . I0I_0 is the article’s single most important number, because it is the rate at which the trait shows up in models that never touched the source at all — the convergence baseline , the rate any theory of pure coincidence has to beat.

Read the equation in its article →

For background, read the article’s source list.

Return to A Chatbot Confessed to Being Built by a Company That Never Trained It

Browse the mathematical compendium →