← Back to article

Equation 74 · The Bend an Elevator Cannot Fake

What does this equation mean?

ν2/ν1=U(Z1)/U(Z2)\nu_2/\nu_1 = U(Z_1)/U(Z_2)

Read the formula alongside the article passage below. Each part has a deeper page with its role in the equation, the supporting passage and nearby citations.

Inputs and operationsU(Z_1)/U(Z_2)
Result or conditionnu_2/nu_1
How to read the two sides of this formula. Follow the article passage for the meaning of each quantity.

This equation states an equality: the expressions on both sides have the same value under the article’s assumptions. Read the equation part by part below; each part has a contextual explanation and a link to its mathematical background.

Read it piece by piece

ν2\nu_2

Symbol nu_2

nu2u_2 is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

ν1\nu_1

Symbol nu_1

nu1u_1 is part of the quantity the equation computes from the expression on the right.

Understand this part →

UU

Symbol U

U is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

Z1Z_1

Symbol Z_1

Z1Z_1 is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

Z2Z_2

Symbol Z_2

Z2Z_2 is an input to the expression that computes the quantity on the left.

Understand this part →

=

=

The expressions on both sides represent the same quantity under the stated assumptions.

Understand this part →

See an illustrated explanation →
subscript

subscript

The lower label selects a particular version, component, or indexed member of the quantity. For example, x₀ and xₜ can be values at different positions.

Understand this part →

How to interpret it

Read it with the definitions, units, and assumptions supplied by the article.

What the article says around this equation

This is an exact solution describing flat Minkowski spacetime in non-inertial coordinates, not a weak-field approximation. A clock held static at height Z has dτ\tau = U(Z)\,dt exactly, so two such clocks compare frequencies as ν2\nu_2/ν1\nu_1 = U(Z1Z_1)/U(Z2Z_2) to all orders — the same exact redshift formula an accelerating rocket produces for light climbing or falling inside it. The node potential is ϕ(Z)\phi(Z) = ln⁡\ln U(Z) = ln⁡(1+gZ/c2)\ln(1 + gZ/c^2) , and its first derivative at Z=0 is ϕ\phi' = g/c2c^2 : a nonzero, entirely real, measurable slope. A network of clocks bolted to this elevator’s walls would report exactly the nonzero edge data a network in a genuine gravitational field reports at the same order. If…
Read the full surrounding passage
This is an exact solution describing flat Minkowski spacetime in non-inertial coordinates, not a weak-field approximation. A clock held static at height Z has dτ\tau = U(Z)\,dt exactly, so two such clocks compare frequencies as ν2\nu_2/ν1\nu_1 = U(Z1Z_1)/U(Z2Z_2) to all orders — the same exact redshift formula an accelerating rocket produces for light climbing or falling inside it. The node potential is ϕ(Z)\phi(Z) = ln⁡\ln U(Z) = ln⁡(1+gZ/c2)\ln(1 + gZ/c^2) , and its first derivative at Z=0 is ϕ\phi' = g/c2c^2 : a nonzero, entirely real, measurable slope. A network of clocks bolted to this elevator’s walls would report exactly the nonzero edge data a network in a genuine gravitational field reports at the same order. If a nonzero slope alone were curvature, this elevator would be curved. It is not; by construction its spacetime is exactly flat, and the geodesic deviation between any two nearby free-falling test particles inside it is exactly zero at every instant, because flatness is a property of the manifold and does not care what coordinates — accelerated, rotating, or otherwise — a particular family of observers happens to use.

Read the equation in its article →

Sources cited in the article section

These citations give research context. Read each source to check which claims it supports.

Return to The Bend an Elevator Cannot Fake

See this formula across 1 published context →

Browse the mathematical compendium →